Obesity Management
in Primary Health Care
......................................................................................................................................................................
Abdulrazak Abyad
A. Abyad, MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE
CEO Abyad Medical Center
Chairman, Middle-East Academy for Medicine of
Aging http://www.meama.com
President, Middle East Association on Age &
Alzheimer's http://www.me-jaa.com/meaaa.htm
Coordinator, Middle-East Primary Care Research
Network http://www.mejfm.com/mepcrn.htm
Coordinator, Middle-East Network on Aging http://www.me-jaa.com/menar-index.htm
Editor, Middle-East Journal of Family Medicine
http://www.mejfm.com
Editor, Middle-East Journal of Age & Aging
http://www.me-jaa.com
Editor, Middle-East Journal of Nursing http://www.me-jn.com
Associate Editor, Middle East Journal of Internal
Medicine http://www.me-jim.com
Correspondence:
Abyad Medical Center http://www.amclb.com
Azmi Street , Abdo Center, POBox 618
Tripoli-Lebanon
Tel & Fax : 961-6-443684
Mobile : 961-3-201901
Email:
aabyad@cyberia.net.lb
ABSTRACT
Obesity is a key public health problem across
the world. Easy solutions are unlikely,
given the complex interaction between the
abundant availability of energy dense food,
and the ever decreasing demand for energy
expenditure in the modern world. This review
paper addresses the issues of overweight
and obesity in primary health care.
Key words: obesity, primary health care,
management
|
Obesity is a key public health
problem across the world. It is a persistent state
that is multi-factorial in origin, intricate to
treat, and is a key contributor to multiple diseases
including heart disease, type II diabetes, hypertension,
stroke and some cancers. Simple solutions are
improbable knowing the multifaceted interaction
between the copious accessibility of energy dense
food, the yet decreasing demand for energy expenditure
in the modern world, and the effect of our genetic
make up (1, 2). Many physicians do not tackle
the question of overweight and obesity with their
patients who fulfill the criteria for obesity
or overweight, or with persons that are at risk
of becoming obese (3,4).
Systemic management of overweight
and obesity is the key for successful approach.
It is important to pinpoint patients who would
benefit from nutritional counseling, since the
behaviors that increase a patient's risk for related
morbidity and mortality are seldom what bring
a patient to the office. A detailed physical activity
and nutrition history is a critical step in helping
overweight and obese patients identify and implement
healthier behaviors. Primary care physicians should
follow the steps below:
Ask Is the patient ready to
make a change?
As frequently as is appropriate,
family physicians should ask every patient who
is at risk for overweight whether he or she is
willing to make one or more health behavior changes.
Advise
There is at least value in simply notifying
a patient that his or her BMI is harmful. For
patients who express an interest in making one
or more changes, advice about nutrition and physical
activity must be clear, exact and geared tailored
to the patient's lifestyle, experience and capabilities.
Assess BMI
The first step in assessing the overweight of
the patient is calculating the BMI. BMI is similar
to blood pressure as a vital sign. It must be
used to establish health risks and to direct discussion
with patients about health behavior changes.
A BMI of 25.0 to 29.9 kg
per m2 is defined as overweight; a BMI of 30.0
kg per m2 or more is defined as obesity.
Waist Circumference
Waist circumference, is an significant independent
risk factor for cardiovascular disease, type 2
diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension (5,6).
The waist measurement must be taken around the
smallest area below the rib cage and above the
umbilicus.
Waist circumference measurements
greater than 40 inches (102 cm) in men or 35 inches
(89 cm) in women indicate an increased risk of
obesity-related comorbidities.
Metabolic Syndrome
The metabolic syndrome consist of five criteria,
three of which must be present to make the diagnosis
(7,8).
Table 1 lists these criteria.
Telling a patient that he or she has the metabolic
syndrome may create a precious counseling chance.
Table 1: NCEP ATP III Diagnostic Factors for
the Metabolic Syndrome*
Risk
Factor Defining Level
1.
Abdominal obesity Men: >102 cm (40 inches)
(waist circumference) Women: >88 cm (35
inches)
2.
Triglycerides >150 mg per dL (1.69
mmol per L)
3. High-density lipoprotein Men:
<40 mg per dL (1.04 mmol per L)
(HDL) cholesterol Women: <50 mg per dL
(1.29 mmol per L)
4. Blood pressure >130/85
mmHg
5. Fasting glucose >110
mg per dL (6.1 mmol per L)
*Diagnosis is established when three or
more of these risk factors are present.
|
There is
little support from prospective studies revealing
that weight loss by obese individuals ameliorate
long-term morbidity and mortality, strong evidence
insinuates that obesity is linked to increased
morbidity and mortality and that weight loss in
obese persons reduces important disease risk factors
(9,10).
In adults, elevated disease risk increases separately
with increasing BMI and excess abdominal fat.
Cardiovascular and other obesity-related disease
risks increase markedly when BMI exceeds 25.0
kg per m2. Overall mortality starts to increase
with BMI levels greater than 25 kg per m2 and
increases most considerably as BMI levels surpass
30 kg per m2. Waist circumference measurements
greater than 40 inches (102 cm) in men and 35
inches (89 cm) in women also point to an increased
risk of obesity-related comorbidities (9).
There is discord concerning whether
the known dangers of being obese cause a greater
health risk than the possible hazards of treatment(9,11,12).
It is preferable to treat patients with a BMI
of 25.0 to 29.9 kg per m2
or a high waist circumference, and two or more
risk factors. Treatment is also preferable for
patients with a BMI of 30 or more kg per m2 regardless
of risk factors. Successful management embraces
dietary therapy, physical activity, behavior therapy,
pharmacotherapy and amalgamation of these methods
( 9). Drugs must be used as a part of a comprehensive
plan. Currently, an appetite suppressant, sibutramine
(Meridia), and a lipase inhibitor, orlistat (Xenical),
are labeled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
for long-term use and may be helpful in the treatment
of suitable high-risk patients.
Pharmacotherapy is used in patients with a BMI
of 30 or more kg per m2 and no associated obesity-related
risk factors or diseases, or patients with a BMI
of 27 or more kg per m2 with associated obesity-related
risk factors or diseases (i.e., hypertension,
dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes
[formerly noninsulin-dependent diabetes] and sleep
apnea).
Surgery may be entertained for difficult cases
where the patients do not respond to medical treatment
because such individuals are at high risk for
the comorbidities associated with obesity. Surgical
treatment of clinically severe obesity normally
is done to restrict caloric intake (e.g., vertical
banded gastroplasty) or to combine caloric restriction
with some degree of malabsorption (e.g., Roux-en-Y
gastric bypass, biliopancreatic bypass).
SPECIAL
CONSIDERATION IN CHILDREN |
Currently children normally eat
more calories than they burn up in physical activity.
This discrepancy results from several recent alterations
at home, school, and neighborhood environments.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) study, Food Marketing
to Children and Youth: Threat or Opportunity (13)
gives a scary report of how this influences children's
health. Food marketing, the IOM says, deliberately
targets children who are too young to differentiate
advertising from genuineness and leads them to
eat high-calorie, low-nutrient "junk"
foods; companies succeed so well in this endeavor
that business-as-usual must not be allowed to
persist.
The IOM report gives enough evidence to maintain
extra policy actions. Restrictions or bans on
the use of cartoon characters, celebrity endorsements,
health claims on food packages, stealth marketing,
and marketing in schools, along with federal actions
that promote media literacy, better school meals,
and consumption of fruits and vegetables.
In the pediatric patients clinical evaluation
must include determination of the BMI percentile
(for age and sex) and vigilant assessment to pinpoint
potential complications of obesity such as hypertension,
dyslipidemias, orthopedic disorders, sleep disorders,
gallbladder disease and insulin resistance (14).
Treatment must be considered in children with
a BMI higher than the 85th percentile and complications
of obesity, or a BMI higher than the 95th percentile
with or without complications.
1. Centre
for Reviews and Dissemination. The prevention
and treatment of obesity. Eff Health Care 1997;3(2).
2. National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification,
evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity
in adults. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung,
and Blood Institute, 1998. Available at ww.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/ob_home.htm
3. Stafford RS, Farhat JH, Misra
B, Schoenfeld DA. National patterns of physician
activities related to obesity management. Arch
Fam Med 2000;9:631-8.
4. Potter MB, Vu JD, Croughan-Minihane
M. Weight management: what patients want from
their primary care physicians. J Fam Pract 2001;50:513-8.
5. Chan JM, Rimm EB, Colditz
GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Obesity, fat distribution,
and weight gain as risk factors for clinical diabetes
in men. Diabetes Care 1994;17:961-9.
6. Kuczmarski RJ, Carrol MD,
Flegal KM, Troiano RP. Varying body mass index
cutoff points to describe overweight prevalence
among US adults: NHANES III (1988 to 1994). Obes
Res 1997;5:542-8.
7. Expert Panel on Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the
Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education
Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III. Bethesda,
Md.: National Institutes of Health; 2001. NIH
Publication No. 01-3670.
8. Expert Panel on the Identification,
Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity
in Adults. Clinical guidelines on the identification,
evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity
in adults: evidence report. Bethesda, Md.: National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Obesity Education
Initiative; 1998. NIH Publication No. 98-4083.
9. National Institutes of Health,
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clinical
guidelines on the identification, evaluation,
and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults--the
evidence report. Obes Res 1998;6(suppl 2):51S-209S
[Published erratum appears in Obes Res 1998:6:464].
Retrieved September 2000 from: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/
guidelines/obesity/ob_home.htm.
10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening
for obesity. In: Guide to clinical preventive
services. 2d ed. Baltimore, Md.: Williams &
Wilkins, 1996:219-29.
11. Thomas PR. Weighing the options:
criteria for evaluating weight-management programs.
Committee to Develop Criteria for Evaluating the
Outcomes of Approaches to Prevent and Treat Obesity,
Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National
Academy Press, 1995.
12. Pi-Sunyer FX. Short-term
medical benefits and adverse effects of weight
loss. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:722-6.
13. McGinnis JM, Gootman JA,
Kraak VI, eds. Food marketing to children and
youth: threat or opportunity? Washington, D.C.:
National Academies Press, 2006.
14. Koplan JP, Liverman CT, Kraak
VI, eds. Preventing childhood obesity: health
in the balance. Washington, D.C.: National Academies
Press, 2005.
|